MULTI-METHOD DIAGNOSIS OF CRANKSHAFT POSITION SENSOR INTERFERENCE IN A THREE-CYLINDER ENGINE FOR AUTOMOTIVE VOCATIONAL TRAINING

Authors

  • Arya Vallenra Melupite Politeknik Negeri Manado, Indonesia
  • Tammy Tinny Veissy Pangow Politeknik Negeri Manado, Indonesia
  • Paul Maarthen Rumangit Politeknik Negeri Manado, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59397/edu.v4i2.298

Keywords:

Automotive Diagnostics, Automotive Vocational Training, Crankshaft Position Sensor, Ignition Misfire, Sensor Fault Diagnosis

Abstract

Crankshaft Position (CKP) sensor interference can disrupt crankshaft synchronization and contribute to asymmetric ignition failure in Electronic Control Unit (ECU)-based engine management systems. This study analyzed CKP parameter deviations in a single Daihatsu Xenia 1.0 non-VVT-i vehicle equipped with an EJ-DE three-cylinder engine and examined a low-cost, multi-method diagnostic sequence for workshop and automotive vocational-training contexts. The study was designed as a single-vehicle diagnostic experimental case comparing operational reference specifications, the faulty condition, and the post-repair condition. Data were obtained through OBD-II scanning, cold and hot coil-resistance measurements, reported signal-amplitude and frequency measurements, and CKP air-gap inspection. In the faulty condition, DTCs P0335 and P0336 were recorded, idle speed fluctuated at 650-710 rpm, STFT reached +18-22%, coil resistance increased to 3,180 Ω at 20°C and 3,740 Ω at 80°C, the reported signal amplitude decreased to 0.3-0.5 Vpp, frequency fell to 410 Hz, and the air gap was recorded at 0.58 mm. After sensor replacement and air-gap adjustment to 0.30 mm, the measured parameters returned to the operational reference ranges. These findings corroborate a diagnosis involving concurrent electrical and mechanical abnormalities in this specific vehicle, but the combined repair does not isolate the independent effect of each abnormality. The diagnostic sequence may support evidence-based troubleshooting practice in automotive vocational education; its instructional effectiveness and transferability require further validation.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-12

How to Cite

Melupite, A. V., Pangow, T. T. V., & Rumangit, P. M. (2026). MULTI-METHOD DIAGNOSIS OF CRANKSHAFT POSITION SENSOR INTERFERENCE IN A THREE-CYLINDER ENGINE FOR AUTOMOTIVE VOCATIONAL TRAINING. EDUCATIONE, 4(2), 1278–1288. https://doi.org/10.59397/edu.v4i2.298

Issue

Section

Original Research Article

Citation Check